RE: Usable sql-back in 2.0.27?

["Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>]

I totally agree with Howard; moreover, from 2.0 to 2.1
back-sql was improved and cleaned-up.

p.

> There is no good reason to invest any more time in 2.0.27, period. The
> 2.0 release is dead; even 2.1 is pretty much frozen now. (Feature-wise,
> nothing new is happening in 2.1.) Any time spent on 2.0 for new
> deployments is certainly a waste.
>
>   -- Howard Chu
>   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
>   http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
>   Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
>> [mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Wil Cooley
>
>> Before I invest a good deal of time experimenting with rebuilding and
>> setting up sql-back, could anyone tell me how usable it is
>> with 2.0.27?
>> I've checked out the AG, FAQ-O-Matic entries, and the last 30
>> or so days
>> of this list; most docs seem to refer to 2.1, but that may be just
>> because of when the docs were updated.


-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it