[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: any surveys about DC vs O,C ?

To: int Mike Jackson <jacksonm@isorauta.ntc.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: any surveys about DC vs O,C ?
From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Date: 25 Mar 2003 10:09:55 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <20030324125028.GA29928@isorauta.ntc.nokia.com>
Organization:
References: <20030324125028.GA29928@isorauta.ntc.nokia.com>

man, 2003-03-24 kl. 13:50 skrev int Mike Jackson:

>  I'm making some comments about how to integrate LDAP directory
> structure together with x.509v3 certs to some standardization groups. I
> am just interested if anybody knows of any studies that have already
> been done about the problems of using certificates which have o,c
> subject names and are published to directories which using the dc model.

Perhaps I've misunderstood the question, but isn't this the standard way
of doing things?

Best,

Tony

-- 

Tony Earnshaw

e-post:		tonni@billy.demon.nl
www:		http://www.billy.demon.nl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: any surveys about DC vs O,C ?
  - From: "int Mike Jackson" <jacksonm@isorauta.ntc.nokia.com>

References:
- any surveys about DC vs O,C ?
  - From: "int Mike Jackson" <jacksonm@isorauta.ntc.nokia.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Problem regarding distinguished name
Next by Date: Re: structural object class of posixAccount?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread