[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Package 2.1.13 -> Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13

To: ando@sys-net.it
Subject: Re: Package 2.1.13 -> Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
From: Jehan PROCACCIA <Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:50:23 +0100
Cc: Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
References: <00a801c2de54$b748dce0$0e01a8c0@CELLO> <3E5E0EE8.3060304@int-evry.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302270855100.7553@robin.uvm.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302271044540.7882@robin.uvm.edu> <33064.131.175.154.56.1046363307.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302271225570.7882@robin.uvm.edu> <33187.131.175.154.56.1046367054.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0302271238050.7882@robin.uvm.edu> <3E5F660A.8030401@int-evry.fr> <34600.131.175.154.56.1046440120.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

That's exactly what it says: the value used in rdn for attr 'cn'
is not present in the entry; if you use in the rdn an attribute
type that's not present in the entry it says
'naming attribute 'cn' is not present in entry'.

OK, I didn't noticed that second one ...

By the way, why this new contraint ? in respect to LDAP RFCs ?
See ITS#2243; it is specified by RFC2251:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200301/msg00081.html


Perfect explanation !, I'll check my old rdns before migrating ..., Thanks .

p.


--
Jehan Procaccia 			| Ingenieur Systemes & Reseaux
Institut National des Telecommunications| Tel : +33 (0) 160764436
MCI, Moyens Communs Informatiques  | Mail: Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr
9 rue Charles Fourier 91011 Evry France | Fax : +33 (0) 160764321

References:
- RE: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: Jehan PROCACCIA <Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr>
- Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>
- Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>
- Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>
- Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>
- Package 2.1.13 -> Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: Jehan PROCACCIA <Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr>
- Re: Package 2.1.13 -> Re: Segmentation fault on 2.1.13
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: OpenLDAP 2.1.x + NSS+SSL connecting to OpenLDAP 2.0.23 = broken?
Next by Date: Re: OpenLDAP 2.1.x + NSS+SSL connecting to OpenLDAP 2.0.23 = broken?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread