[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Update on performance issues with Openldap 2.1.x and Solaris 8

To: "OpenLDAP.org" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Update on performance issues with Openldap 2.1.x and Solaris 8
From: Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 02:57:38 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <1045317299.3597.11.camel@estate1.whitemice.org>; from awilliam@whitemice.org on Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:54:58AM -0500
References: <93844821.1041594823@cadabra.stanford.edu> <20030214155231.A64640@bolthole.com> <1045306905.13160.259.camel@localhost> <1045317299.3597.11.camel@estate1.whitemice.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
> ....
> True.  I'd wager that bdb would roast Informix/Oracle/etc... for several
> kinds of applications anyway.

But whats important here is one SPECIFIC application.
Has no-one got comparison figures to share?

I thought someone would have replied to this by now, but I havent seen
anything with figures on performance comparisons with Oracle or comperable
on the back end.
I'm curious how it would compare under heavy load.

References:
- Re: Update on performance issues with Openldap 2.1.x and Solaris 8
  - From: Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
- Re: Update on performance issues with Openldap 2.1.x and Solaris 8
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
- Re: Update on performance issues with Openldap 2.1.x and Solaris 8
  - From: Adam Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>

Prev by Date: Re: solaris LDAP C library .so
Next by Date: Re: sample ldifs & sample slapd.conf
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread