[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: GDBM vs BDB as openldap backend.

To: Jehan PROCACCIA <Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr>
Subject: Re: GDBM vs BDB as openldap backend.
From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Date: 07 Feb 2003 14:59:02 +0100
Cc: Justin Zygmont <jzygmont@solarflow.dyndns.org>, OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <3E437D10.5070107@int-evry.fr>
Organization:
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302061628050.9553-100000@solarflow.dyndns.org> <1044601255.6229.5.camel@localhost> <3E437D10.5070107@int-evry.fr>

fre, 2003-02-07 kl. 10:32 skrev Jehan PROCACCIA:

> > Adding my own two Eurocents' worth to what Alan wrote, I'd remark that
> > there is excellent and comprehensive documentation for BDB in the
> > Sleepycat installation tarball. It explains (almost?) everything you'd
> > want to know.
> > 
> > And using BDB, fixing a corrupt database, making backups and other
> > necessary maintenance is both easy and 100% assured of success.

> Correct, that's what the doc says ... However a small procedure/howto or 
> even an example on how to backup, restore and tunning the databases 
> would be very  welcome .

Bits, at least, are covered in the FAQ. Probably because this question
is asked frequently.

For the rest: Brian Jones! Are you reading this too?

Best,

Tony

-- 

Tony Earnshaw

When all's said and done ...
there's nothing left to say or do.

e-post:		tonni@billy.demon.nl
www:		http://www.billy.demon.nl

References:
- Re: GDBM vs BDB as openldap backend.
  - From: Justin Zygmont <jzygmont@solarflow.dyndns.org>
- Re: GDBM vs BDB as openldap backend.
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
- Re: GDBM vs BDB as openldap backend.
  - From: Jehan PROCACCIA <Jehan.Procaccia@int-evry.fr>

Prev by Date: adding entry vs modifying an entry
Next by Date: Re: pam_ldap: What if LDAP server not reachable?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread