[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: It is possible to have a suffix "dn=domain.com"



Well.

I have read RFC 2247 and it says how to split the Domain, but does not
define it as a MUST.

So, are ldapadd and ldapmodify buggy? or the RFC does not enforce the
use of Domain Components?




On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 19:18, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <1039044648.813.37.camel@Grissom.tac.noldata.com> on 04 Dec 2002 18:30:48 -0500, Gustavo Lozano <glozano@noldata.com> said:
> 
> glozano> I want to know if is it possible to have a suffix just like
> glozano> 
> glozano> suffix    "dc=domain.com"
> glozano> 
> glozano> instead
> glozano> 
> glozano> suffix    "dc=domain,dc=com"
> 
> Nope, that's incorrect use of DC.
> 
> [...]
> glozano> Now lets delete it:
> glozano> 
> glozano> bash# ldapdelete -Duid=root,dc=domain.com -W
> glozano> Enter LDAP Password: 
> glozano> dn:uid=test,dc="domain.com"
> glozano> Delete Result: Invalid DN syntax (34)
> glozano> Additional info: invalid DN
> glozano> 
> glozano> 
> glozano> But ldapadd and ldapmodify works!!
> 
> I'd rather say that ldapadd and ldapmodify are buggy for not detecting
> this...
-- 
_________________                                 __________________
Gustavo A. Lozano                                 Noldata Corporation
glozano@noldata.com                               Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO                                               Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation                               http://noldata.com

            I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
               but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
                                                       Albert Einstein

This Message has been scanned for Virus Content using RAV Antivirus.
Get your copy of RAV Antivirus at Noldata, send mail to 
sales@noldata.com		http://noldata.com