[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP control for multipile domains

To: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: LDAP control for multipile domains
From: post+openldap@macallister.grass-valley.ca.us
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:48:33 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0211201527430.26316-100000@dev.itsite.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0211201527430.26316-100000@dev.itsite.com>

--On Wednesday, November 20, 2002 03:50:51 PM -0500 Derek Simkowiak 
<dereks@itsite.com> wrote:

> 	Second: The "dc=domain, dc=tld" layout has become popular lately
> (I'm not sure but it may have something to do with some global
> directory project), but I strongly recommend against it.

Well, the structure that you dislike so much is more than just "popular 
lately", it is a standards track RFC, i.e. RFC 2247.  Personally, I 
think that it is better to follow the standards rather than cater to 
some broken client.

Bill

+----------------------------------------------------
| Bill MacAllister
| 14219 Auburn Road
| Grass Valley, CA 95949
| Phone: 530-272-8555

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAP control for multipile domains
  - From: Adam Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>
- Re: LDAP control for multipile domains
  - From: Derek Simkowiak <dereks@itsite.com>

References:
- Re: LDAP control for multipile domains
  - From: Derek Simkowiak <dereks@itsite.com>

Prev by Date: Re: account balances
Next by Date: Re: Does a Slave-server needs to see a Master ?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread