[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: dc question

Tony Earnshaw writes:
> I would postulate that the dc in an objectClass dc has nothing
> whatsoever to do with the dc as part of the dn attribute in an rdn.

Wrong.  Read the LDAP standard (rfc2251), section 3.2 (Data Model):

  (...) Entries have names: one or more attribute values
  from the entry form its relative distinguished name (RDN), (...)

> You want to put: dc: Snoggit instead of dc: blabla, that's o.k. with
> Openldap 2.1.5.

Yes, as other have said, OpenLDAP does not check this requirement.

-- 
Hallvard