[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED

To: Christoph Neumann <enigma@apu.edu>
Subject: RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 10:56:58 -0700
Cc: Adam Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>, "'openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org'" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208051012170.5534-100000@home.apu.edu>
References: <1028242740.15693.2.camel@estate1.whitemice.org>

At 10:13 AM 2002-08-05, Christoph Neumann wrote:
>Why isn't this required?  Is seems that not normalizing just leads to
>matching problems.  Even if the spec doesn't require it, why doesn't
>OpenLDAP normalize them?

IMO, this is a bug in 2.0.  It's fixed in 2.1.

Kurt


>- Christoph
>
>
>On 1 Aug 2002, Adam Williams wrote:
>
>> >I still haven't found anything definitive on dn normalization, so I'm
>> >assuming it's specific to each LDAP implementation.
>> 
>> The spec stats that the DSA is NOT required to normalize DNs submitted
>> for storage or DNs that are part of a query.

References:
- RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED
  - From: Adam Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>
- RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED
  - From: Christoph Neumann <enigma@apu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Concurrency Control on LDAP?
Next by Date: Re: Copying master slapd database to slave
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread