[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED

To: Adam Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>
Subject: RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED
From: Christoph Neumann <enigma@apu.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 10:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org'" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <1028242740.15693.2.camel@estate1.whitemice.org>

Why isn't this required?  Is seems that not normalizing just leads to
matching problems.  Even if the spec doesn't require it, why doesn't
OpenLDAP normalize them?

- Christoph

On 1 Aug 2002, Adam Williams wrote:

> >I still haven't found anything definitive on dn normalization, so I'm
> >assuming it's specific to each LDAP implementation.
> 
> The spec stats that the DSA is NOT required to normalize DNs submitted
> for storage or DNs that are part of a query.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- RE: Difficulty searching by groupOfNames member - RESOLVED
  - From: Adam Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>

Prev by Date: Solaris 8 and pam_ldap
Next by Date: Re: Concurrency Control on LDAP?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread