[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Index corruption after multiple updates



On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 13:47, Howard Chu wrote:
> RedHat 7.1 is known to have a broken threads library and cannot be safely
> used.
> 

What exactly is broken, the glibc stuff, the kernel or what.  I can
upgrade glibc to the 7.2 version, would that fix the threading issue? 
Kernel?

Michael


>   -- Howard Chu
>   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
>   http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
>   Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> > [mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Paul M Fleming
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:20 AM
> > To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> > Subject: Index corruption after multiple updates
> >
> >
> > I have a definate problem with index corruption under 2.0.23. The
> > problem can be solved in the short run by doing a slapcat removing the
> > DB files and doing a slapadd -- the problem usually reoccurs within 24
> > hours. (commenting out the affected index also fixes the problem but (of
> > course) has a big performance impact). Running slapindex does NOT fix
> > the problem. This problem is occuring on the master and on the slaves.
> > The version of _all_ software on each is identical (we run cfengine so
> > I'm sure of this) The version information is as follows:
> >
> > 	Linux 2.4.2-2
> > 	Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf)
> > 	openssl-0.9.6
> > 	db3-3.1.17
> > 	openldap-2.0.23
> > 	cyrus-sasl-1.5.24
> > 	krb5-libs-1.2.2
> >
> > 	configure information
> > 		--enable-wrappers \
> >                 --enable-cleartext \
> >                 --with-cyrus-sasl \
> >                 --enable-spasswd \
> >                 --enable-kpasswd \
> >                 --with-kerberos=k5 \
> >                 --enable-ipv6=no \
> >                 --with-tls \
> >                 --prefix=/usr
> >
> > Are there any known issues with db 3.1.17?? I couldn't find any open
> > bugs at http://www.openldap.org/its/
> > Could this be thread or concurrency related?? I haven't built a test
> > harness yet to be able to reproduce the problem, but that shouldn't be
> > too hard.
> >
> > Suggestions???
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Paul Fleming
> > SIU School of Medicine
> > Springfield Il USA
> > pfleming@siumed.edu
-- 
Public key available from http://students.cs.byu.edu/~torriem


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part