[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Memory leak bug (bug 1116) still valid?

To: "Keith T. Garner" <kgarner@kgarner.com>
Subject: Re: Memory leak bug (bug 1116) still valid?
From: John Morrissey <jwm@horde.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:08:44 -0500
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org, dribin@crt.realtors.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20020222215332.GA24841@nickel.kgarner.com>
References: <20020222181202.GA23626@nickel.kgarner.com> <20020222184106.GA1582@horde.net> <20020222215332.GA24841@nickel.kgarner.com>

On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:53:32PM -0600, Keith T. Garner wrote:
% I saw a link to your patches in the bug report, but it was stale.  If you
% still have the patches I'll do the compare and confirm this.

I just had a look at the CVS revision history; it looks like those changes
were backported from HEAD on 6 November and did, in fact, make it into
2.0.19.

john
-- 
John Morrissey          _o            /\         ----  __o
jwm@horde.net        _-< \_          /  \       ----  <  \,
www.horde.net/    __(_)/_(_)________/    \_______(_) /_(_)__

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Memory leak bug (bug 1116) still valid?
  - From: Dave Dribin <dribin@crt.realtors.org>

References:
- Memory leak bug (bug 1116) still valid?
  - From: "Keith T. Garner" <kgarner@kgarner.com>
- Re: Memory leak bug (bug 1116) still valid?
  - From: John Morrissey <jwm@horde.net>
- Re: Memory leak bug (bug 1116) still valid?
  - From: "Keith T. Garner" <kgarner@kgarner.com>

Prev by Date: rootdse and ldap uri's
Next by Date: Re: rootdse and ldap uri's
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread