[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Backsql faster then sleepycat dbm?

To: <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Backsql faster then sleepycat dbm?
From: "Michael Cunningham" <m.cunningham@xpedite.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:08:09 -0500
Importance: Normal
Organization: Xpedite Systems Inc.
Sensitivity: Private

Hiya,

I was wondering if anyone has done any bench marks 
regarding using the backsql option/mysql versus sleepycat db. 
I am going to have roughly 2k entries in the ldap server with 
approximatly 100 attributes each. If it isnt faster.. what would be a 
compelling reason to use it over sleepycat.

Thanks.. 
--
Michael Cunningham
Enterprise Projects Manager
Xpedite Systems Inc. 
Work: 732-389-3900 x7296
Cell: 732-547-8392
Email: m.cunningham@xpedite.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Backsql faster then sleepycat dbm?
  - From: "Dan Melomedman" <dmelomed@devonitnet.com>

Prev by Date: Re: performance problems
Next by Date: RE: Outlook and openldap
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread