[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: misc.schema

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: misc.schema
From: Matthew Schumacher <matt.s@aptalaska.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 11:45:47 -0900
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020108081632.016d6b38@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20020108114352.017060f8@127.0.0.1>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2

hmmm...

Should I be using a different OID? I mean, what is one to do without a formal standard?

schu

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

At 11:20 AM 2002-01-08, Matthew Schumacher wrote:

That list has been dead for a long time... the last post is dated "Thu Apr 26 2001 - 18:53:54 PDT"  Anyway, to answer the question, no, there has never been any decision on the OID.  In my setup I am using 2.16.840.1.113.730.3.2.147


That's a improperly delegated OID.  I suspect a typo of:
        2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.147

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: misc.schema
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: misc.schema
  - From: Stefan Alfredsson <bulk@alfredsson.org>

References:
- Re: misc.schema
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: misc.schema
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Access question
Next by Date: Re: misc.schema
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread