[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: performance problem with sldap



OK,  Upgrading to 2.0.18 did not help still the same problem occurs.

-Aleks

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan-Michael Ong [mailto:jmong@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:44 AM
To: Aleks Sheynkman
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: RE: performance problem with sldap


I don't think so... The only way I can think off is that you do a dump of 
your database as an LDIF (using slapcat) and importing back the LDIF into 
the LDAP (using slapadd)

good luck

jm

At 10:11 AM 11/5/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Is there are way to migrate database from version to version?
>
>Thanks !
>-Aleks
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jan-Michael Ong [mailto:jmong@adobe.com]
>Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:08 AM
>To: Aleks Sheynkman
>Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
>Subject: RE: performance problem with sldap
>
>
>You may be running into the sockbuf_max_incoming  limit, adjust this in
>your slapd.conf. (thanks Kurt Zeilenga)
>
>here's a sample
>
>   Define global ACLs to disable default read access.
>
># Do not enable referrals until AFTER you have a working directory
># service AND an understanding of referrals.
>#referral       ldap://root.openldap.org
>
>pidfile         /usr/local/var/slapd.pid
>argsfile        /usr/local/var/slapd.args
>loglevel        256
>sizelimit       5
>timelimit       3600
>schemacheck     on
>sockbuf_max_incoming    1234567  <--- adjust this to a higher number or
>define it if you do not have it defined.
>
>I don't know what causes it though. Also I upgraded from Openldap-2.0.11 to
>Openldap-2.0.18 and db-3.2.9 to db 3-3.11 that seemed to solve other
>problems
>
>good luck
>
>jm
>
>
>
>At 09:40 AM 11/5/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> >Does anyone have any ideas what might cause this problem? Please help..!!
> >
> >
> >Thanks a lot in advance !
> >
> >-Aleks
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Aleks Sheynkman
> >Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:53 AM
> >To: Aleks Sheynkman; 'Jonghyuk Choi'; 'res0k3ja@verizon.net'
> >Cc: 'openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org'
> >Subject: RE: performance problem with sldap
> >
> >
> >I ran the same test on another server which has only 200 entries.
Basically
> >same behavior is happening after 3,000 continues searches ldapsearch stat
> >throwing "Can't contact LDAP server" errors.
> >
> >Thanks !
> >
> >-Aleks
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Aleks Sheynkman
> >Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 7:45 AM
> >To: 'Jonghyuk Choi'; 'res0k3ja@verizon.net'
> >Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> >Subject: RE: performance problem with sldap
> >
> >
> >I increased
> >from :
> >cachesize 100000000
> >dbcachesize 320000000
> >
> >to
> >cachesize 1000000000
> >dbcachesize 1000000000
> >sizelimit 5000000
> >
> >Also I added cachesize. Server seems to be up and running all the time.
>When
> >I do 5,000 searches , first 3,000 goes very fast and then it starts
>printing
> >error messages "ldap_bind: Can't contact LDAP server".
> >
> >I running server following platform:
> >   Linux 6.2.
> >    2x750 MHz
> >    2GB RAM
> >
> >Thanks !
> >
> >-Aleks
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jonghyuk Choi [mailto:jongchoi@us.ibm.com]
> >Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:28 AM
> >To: Aleks Sheynkman
> >Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> >Subject: Re: performance problem with sldap
> >
> >
> >
> >It would be possible that slapd went down running short of memory.
> >The entry cache size looks large for 200K directory,
> >even though slapd allocates cache entries on demand.
> >The entry cache is designated as the number of entries
> >while the db cache is as the number of bytes.
> >- Jong
> >=======================
> >IBM T. J. Watson Research
> >Enterprise Linux Group, Linux Technology Center
> >jongchoi@us.ibm.com