Re: A New Question about Referrals.

["Mark Diggory" <mdiggory@latte.harvard.edu>]

I found and looked through the draft. That's specifically the behavior I
hoped was possible. Thanks, I look forward to this feature...I won't touch
that dial.
-M.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
To: <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Cc: "Mark Diggory" <mdiggory@latte.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: A New Question about Referrals.


> Looks like there are a number of problem cases when
> the DN of the ref isn't the same as the DN of referral
> entry.  That is, when the referred to object is not
> immediately subordinate to the referral object.  I've
> been meaning to update this code to implement the
> latest namedref draft (which requires servers to return
> of explicit DNs and scope).  I'll try to fix up
> non-subordinate referrals at the same time.  So,
> stay tuned...
>
>