[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Comparisons using caseIgnoreOrderingMatch

To: Chris Smith <unicycle@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Comparisons using caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 18:39:20 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <3AEFA66D.AF93C936@mindspring.com>

At 11:17 PM 5/1/01, Chris Smith wrote:
>Am I doing something wrong or is that the way it is supposed to be?

RFC 2252:
   The sort ordering for a caseIgnoreOrderingMatch is implementation-
   dependent.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comparisons using caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
  - From: Chris Smith <unicycle@mindspring.com>

References:
- Comparisons using caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
  - From: Chris Smith <unicycle@mindspring.com>

Prev by Date: building 1.2.11 on Mac OS X
Next by Date: Re: Comparisons using caseIgnoreOrderingMatch
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread