[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: free/non-free ladp servers comparizon

To: Kalman KK Wan <kkkwan@itsd.gcn.gov.hk>
Subject: Re: free/non-free ladp servers comparizon
From: David Obadia <dobadia@aurora-linux.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 14:26:05 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <48256984.004088DD.00@itsmailgw.itsd.gcn.gov.hk>; from kkkwan@itsd.gcn.gov.hk on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 07:44:41PM +0800
References: <48256984.004088DD.00@itsmailgw.itsd.gcn.gov.hk>
User-agent: Mutt/1.0.1i

On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 07:44:41PM +0800, Kalman KK Wan wrote:
> Sizing up LDAP servers
> http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/0515rev2.html

http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2000/0515rev2.html?nf#numbers

The performance rates for OpenLDAP compared to Active Directory Server are not
even close: How objective are this tests?

Search Rate test with one client (Operation/sec):
Open LDAP on Linux           => 4.5
Active Directory on Win 2000 => 999

I'd like to see the tools they've used to make this tests!

There is probably caching or something, that completely fake the result...

Does anyone have a better explanation?

Regards,

-- 
| David Obadia - Aurora
| mailto:dobadia@aurora-linux.com
| http://www.aurora-linux.com/
| phone: +33 (0)1 58 17 03 20

Follow-Ups:
- Re: free/non-free ladp servers comparizon
  - From: Cliff Friedel <cliff@wrkcs.net>
- Re: free/non-free ladp servers comparizon
  - From: Ron Chmara <ron@opus1.com>

References:
- free/non-free ladp servers comparizon
  - From: "Kalman KK Wan" <kkkwan@itsd.gcn.gov.hk>

Prev by Date: free/non-free ladp servers comparizon
Next by Date: Re: free/non-free ladp servers comparizon
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread