At 10:13 AM 10/23/00 +0100, Jim Hud wrote: >The main point is you can't use o: until it has been defined, hence the >invalid syntax. No! Any entry can contain an 'o' attribute if allowed by one or more of the entries object class. The first entry in question is of objectClass organization which not only allows 'o', it requires 'o'. Removal of the 'o' attribute would case an object class violation. Kurt