[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldap_init vs ldap_open?

To: shltch@osfmail.isc.rit.edu
Subject: Re: ldap_init vs ldap_open?
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 07:50:09 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.05.9906101031030.1495-100000@grace>

At 10:33 AM 6/10/99 -0400, shltch@osfmail.isc.rit.edu wrote:
>Hello again,
>
>After reading about ldap_init and ldap_open, it seems that ldap_open will
>be deprecated soon, and I should use ldap_init.  But ldap_init never works
>for me.

ldap_init was broken in UMich 3.3 and early versions of OpenLDAP.
It's works in OpenLDAP 1.2.3 (all our client/tools use ldap_init).

ldap_open is listed as deprecated on IETF draft LDAP C API
specification.  However, it is still part of the API implementations
are required to provide.  As such, ldap_open will be included
in OpenLDAP 2.0.

References:
- ldap_init vs ldap_open?
  - From: shltch@osfmail.isc.rit.edu

Prev by Date: ldap_init vs ldap_open?
Next by Date: ACL help
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread