[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
ftcstr attribute replacement ?
- To: openldap-fortress@openldap.org
- Subject: ftcstr attribute replacement ?
- From: Emmanuel LÃcharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:31:19 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bQ6HVOpT25wMnLUTa9dqwIOfyQZ4Yh91dhGR8kXafuA=; b=fsq+WcvgwXFWklQZHw5V2C8cE0V97jjrQpm4uUzu5rQamH1vviVhFom4ePNTxXj+Z3 EHY8XradnPdovb3LS1uAFZqIVnCwsRtyyZ0C3o+U7PkT14ETxo1GZtqSKByaVw+vJav6 JgU0SNpZQd0F85TmkFysCodx4gzp2Mh4t27+QKJYx69/E/mkeoiwyvO9AgYwItXjB6jF FZslNtcJ4JQMoxNbI/IHmntLBbjrfR/ZP2R94UeGY2zx28k1qXFYt15SZVUL2ck25BOK QWN817VLxLBUInLUL7hvRalGNIZ7tG5XaCBD4eC/sKuax938FMt2MjxeTAsOXXUI26MJ /ZKw==
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
Hi Shawn,
I was wondering if it would not be a good idea to replace the ftcStr
attribute which is used in the ftUserAttrs ObjectClass by some
attributes associated in an auxilliary ObjectClass ?
In term of performance, that will make no difference.
wdyt ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel LÃcharny
www.iktek.com