[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: FAQ and ancient entries

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: FAQ and ancient entries
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:46:12 +0200
Cc: openldap-devel@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <6CA739A13870B59638CBD22D@[192.168.1.199]>
References: <6CA739A13870B59638CBD22D@[192.168.1.199]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090606 SeaMonkey/1.1.17

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and earlier)
> information that is completely obsolete.  It would be nice to be able to
> archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use. 
> Thoughts on how best to achieve this?

Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are not of
such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain an archive.

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAQ and ancient entries
  - From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>

References:
- FAQ and ancient entries
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RE24 testing for 2.4.18
Next by Date: Re: FAQ and ancient entries
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread