[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
back-ldif in HEAD with test011
I got failure because the entries were in a different order:
[quanah@freelancer testrun]$ diff -u ldapsearch.flt ldif.flt
--- ldapsearch.flt 2009-01-20 13:50:56.000000000 -0800
+++ ldif.flt 2009-01-20 13:50:56.000000000 -0800
@@ -14,15 +14,6 @@
telephoneNumber: +1 313 555 1817
associatedDomain: example.com
-dn: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com
-objectClass: person
-cn: Manager
-cn: Directory Manager
-cn: Dir Man
-sn: Manager
-description: Manager of the directory
-userPassword:: c2VjcmV0
-
dn: ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: organizationalUnit
objectClass: extensibleObject
@@ -105,6 +96,15 @@
facsimileTelephoneNumber: +1 313 555 2756
telephoneNumber: +1 313 555 8232
+dn: cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com
+objectClass: person
+cn: Manager
+cn: Directory Manager
+cn: Dir Man
+sn: Manager
+description: Manager of the directory
+userPassword:: c2VjcmV0
+
dn: cn=Mark Elliot,ou=Alumni Association,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: OpenLDAPperson
cn: Mark Elliot
We may need to change the expectations for this test if ldif is the
database.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration