Re: back-bdb flaw

[Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>]

Howard Chu wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
> > Howard Chu wrote:
> > > Seems like the best fix is to deprecate back-bdb and only use back-hdb
> > > from now on.
> >
> > But I vaguely remember that back-hdb has higher memory consumption.
>
> Eh? back-hdb has a smaller memory footprint, as well as a smaller 
> on-disk footprint.

Glad to stand corrected regarding this. ;-)

Ciao, Michael.