[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Please test RE_24
Aaron Richton wrote:
test039 -b bdb, under watchmalloc so this in theory is The Actual Instruction:
I can tar up the testrun directory (or the entire source tree) if
interested.
What OS and compiler version? Can you rule out hardware errors here? Compiler
optimization bugs? This trace shows an actual SEGV in back-ldap, whereas your
previous testrun directory doesn't show any faults.
Your previous one shows a successful Add of an entry (James A Jones 3) but
subsequent references to it get No Such Object. That implies an index
corruption, but the actual database files look ok. Also the offending entry is
present in the final ldapsearch output, so really the DB seems consistent.
Any problem in back-bdb should have turned up in test008 first.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/