Re: imporvement to slapo-constraint (ITS#4987)

[manu@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus)]

Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:

> > 2) configuration syntax: do we keep this one or do we swtich to
> > something else?
> 
> Something like
>       constraint-reference attr1 attr2
> might be better.
> 
> For simple directives, it's better to use positional parameters and no tag
> words.

How are you going to handle the regex constraint case? Do you also want
to change its syntax? That will break setups on upgrade, except if we
adopt a new syntax while retaining the old one for backard
compatibility. 

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@netbsd.org