Re: accesslog schema

[Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> > Howard Chu wrote:
> >
> > > I suppose I should at least write up an Informational RFC to go along 
> > > with this
> > what's its status?
> >
> > I think the reqControls and reqRespControls (not implemented yet by 
> > accesslog; I'm working at it) should have "X-ORDERED 'VALUES'", as 
> > ordering __might__ matter (RFC 4511 is not quite definitive on the subject:
> >
> >    Additionally, unless order-dependent semantics are given in a
> >    specification, the order of a combination of controls in the SEQUENCE
> >    is ignored.
> >
> > but at least it leaves room for specifying order-based semantics).
>
> Nevermind, I've found a spec with X-ORDERED...

Right, as documented here
http://www.highlandsun.com/hyc/drafts/draft-chu-ldap-logschema-xx.html
they are intended to be Ordered.

Unfortunately the dependency on the xordered spec has kind of held up 
publishing of the logschema spec, since the xordered spec still needs a lot of 
corrections.
--
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/