[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-monitor and "" rooted DBs

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: back-monitor and "" rooted DBs
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:28:34 +0200
Cc: openldap-devel@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <0205643844E1501740D27D1D@quanahs-computer.local>
References: <0205643844E1501740D27D1D@quanahs-computer.local>

Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
> (...) IIRC, there have been issues in the past having "database
> monitor" come before other database definitions.  I thought it would
> be worthwhile to allow "database monitor" to be instantiated after a
> 'database ""' definition.  Thoughts?

Sounds OK if a bit inconsistent - which makes me wonder:
Has back-config made it easier to allow databases to
come in any order in slapcd.onf?

-- 
Regards,
Hallvard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: back-monitor and "" rooted DBs
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- back-monitor and "" rooted DBs
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Getting more meaningful error out of back-config
Next by Date: Re: back-monitor and "" rooted DBs
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread