[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Modrdn replication

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@openldap.org>
Subject: Re: Modrdn replication
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:46:32 -0800
Cc: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>, OpenLDAP Devel <openldap-devel@openldap.org>
In-reply-to: <45B2868D.5030107@symas.com>
References: <45B22A62.7070702@sys-net.it> <200701201556.l0KFupiq009095@boole.openldap.org> <45B2868D.5030107@symas.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a2pre) Gecko/20070120 Netscape/7.2 (ax) Firefox/1.5 SeaMonkey/1.5a

Howard Chu wrote:

The perceived problem isn't a problem with syncrepl, and I don't see a compelling general use case for this.

Hm, I take this back. If we're pushing syncrepl through a proxy, the proxy could use this control. Though it may not matter much if no other servers implement the control...

--
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Modrdn replication
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

References:
- Modrdn replication
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: Modrdn replication
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: Modrdn replication
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Modrdn replication
Next by Date: Re: Modrdn replication
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread