Question about the config branch

[<sparklezou@hotmail.com>]

Dear all,

   I read the source code of config branch. I'm puzzled that why the 
schema for config branch are defined in the source code, not in a .schema 
file? It a little dificult to extend the config schema. ^_^

   And I also think in the schema syntax, it would be better if there 
exists an attribute named "rdn", not only MAST and MAY. for example:

   objectclass ( 2.5.6.6 NAME 'person'
	DESC 'RFC2256: a person'
	SUP top STRUCTURAL
	MUST ( sn $ cn )
	MAY ( userPassword $ telephoneNumber $ seeAlso $ description ) )


   Modified to:

   objectclass ( 2.5.6.6 NAME 'person'
	DESC 'RFC2256: a person'
	SUP top STRUCTURAL
         RDN ( sn )
	MUST ( cn )
	MAY ( userPassword $ telephoneNumber $ seeAlso $ description ) )

  It defines that this objectclass should use sn to identify the entry, 
not cn.

  what about your idea?

Best Regards,
Sparkle Zou