Re: back-config, includes

[Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>]

Howard Chu wrote:

> You're welcome to suggest something else. There's no reason that the 
> character used in the filesystem needs to be the same as the one in 
> the DIT, but it would be a bad idea to make the DIT representation vary.

One quick approach is to allow custom replacement of chars from DIT to 
FS and forth.  One could freely remap "=", "{",  "}". and any other 
offending char (something like autoconf rewriting all FS-specific chars 
to "_", but reversible).

p.



   SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497