[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: restrictions based off hash mechanisms (was: ITS#3446)

To: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
Subject: Re: restrictions based off hash mechanisms (was: ITS#3446)
From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:42:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <50532.131.175.154.56.1104838442.squirrel@131.175.154.56>
References: <Pine.SOL.4.58.0501031456450.1581@toolbox.rutgers.edu> <50066.131.175.154.56.1104833683.squirrel@131.175.154.56> <50532.131.175.154.56.1104838442.squirrel@131.175.154.56>

> I have a patch for this, which I'll attach to the original ITS.

The patch looks like the right idea. I'm planning to put together a 2.3
testbed in the coming days; I'll be sure to include the patch and try it
out.

References:
- restrictions based off hash mechanisms (was: ITS#3446)
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
- Re: restrictions based off hash mechanisms (was: ITS#3446)
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: restrictions based off hash mechanisms (was: ITS#3446)
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: restrictions based off hash mechanisms (was: ITS#3446)
Next by Date: Re: (ITS#3472) return code should be 32 when no access to object
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread