[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: delay slap_sasl_destroy()

To: ando@sys-net.it
Subject: Re: delay slap_sasl_destroy()
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 18:02:33 -0700
Cc: <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <61127.81.72.89.40.1084576842.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it>
References: <61127.81.72.89.40.1084576842.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it>

At 04:20 PM 5/14/2004, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>would it be a problem if I delay slap_sasl_destroy() right after
>slap_destroy(), or at least inside it but right after the backends
>have been destroyed?

Seems okay.  Anyone see any problems with this change?

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- RE: delay slap_sasl_destroy()
  - From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>

References:
- delay slap_sasl_destroy()
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: about DN rewrite/remap overlay
Next by Date: RE: delay slap_sasl_destroy()
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread