[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c
re: Abandon with pending ops - it seemed to me that it was better to let the
Abandon proceed, because one way or the other that will free up resources for
the pending ops to get thru. If a running op is abandoned, that's fine. If a
pending op is abandoned, that's even better, because it can be removed from
the pending list without any other overhead...
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-commit@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-commit@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of
> kurt@OpenLDAP.org
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 12:33 PM
> To: OpenLDAP Commit
> Subject: commit: ldap/servers/slapd connection.c
>
>
> Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd
>
> Modified Files:
> connection.c 1.264 -> 1.265
>
> Log Message:
> ITS#2959: provide reason for deferring operation in log message
> Also, took away abandon operations blank check against deferment.
> Abandon must be deferred in some cases (such as when other operations
> are pending) and should be deferred in some other cases (such as too
> many threads).
>
>
> CVS Web URLs:
> http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/
>
> http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/connection.c
>
> Changes are generally available on cvs.openldap.org (and CVSweb)
> within 30 minutes of being committed.
>