[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: HEADS UP: API error code changes

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: API error code changes
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:42:35 +0100
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.0.20031210202629.02707108@127.0.0.1>
References: <6.0.0.22.0.20031210202629.02707108@127.0.0.1>

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
> Since protocol codes must be non-negative, I've changed all API error
> codes to be negative values.

Negative codes make me a bit nervous.  Why not use codes >= 16384, since
they are for private use according to rfc3383?

-- 
Hallvard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: HEADS UP: API error code changes
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- HEADS UP: API error code changes
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Operation thread-safe
Next by Date: RE: proxyAuthz propagation in back-ldap
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread