[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: current C API draft.

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: current C API draft.
From: "Kervin L. Pierre" <kervin@blueprint-tech.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:32:02 -0400
Cc: openldap-devel <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020415123313.0270caf8@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.0.20020415163858.02793db8@127.0.0.1>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020422


ldap.h claims to support draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-04.txt and not
draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-05.txt , the last version of the draft.

After reading the two drafts I did not catch any differences ( maybe I should have read more carefully ), but why not change the supported version to 05?

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

As 2.x moves forward, I think we should aim for compatibility
with our existing implementation (of a LDAPext LDAP C API
I-D).  Those who want RFC 1823/U-Mich LDAP compatibility should
use OpenLDAP 1.x.

With the number of issues fixed in 2.0, I don't believe anyone should be encouraged to use the 1.x series.


--Kervin

References:
- Re: current C API draft.
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: current C API draft.
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: RE: Problems with SSL
Next by Date: deprecated functions in ldap.h
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread