At 03:11 PM 2002-04-15, Kervin Pierre wrote: >Maybe as we move forward, we should aim to maintain 1823 compatibility functions? As 2.x moves forward, I think we should aim for compatibility with our existing implementation (of a LDAPext LDAP C API I-D). Those who want RFC 1823/U-Mich LDAP compatibility should use OpenLDAP 1.x. If and when another alternative becomes available, we'll consider it. Kurt