Re: ITS#1679 gentle SIGHUP handling

[Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>]

Pierangelo Masarati writes:
>Howard Chu wrote:
> 
>> It may be a good idea to have the frontend return UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM on
> > all new update requests once a gentle shutdown has started.

Will do.

>> It still
>> wouldn't address the problem of long-lived read-only sessions though...

Short-time clients can be services, but long-lived clients are just
users.  At least at our site.
 
> What about forcing a cache flush and then disable it when a gentle
> shutdown is requested?

How do I do that?

-- 
Hallvard