RE: back-bdb

["Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>]

I've been looking into this as well, but haven't found a convenient format
yet.
Perhaps BER is the best choice.

  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
  http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Marijn Meijles

> > the conversion from database format to in-memory format should
> > be significantly less than that in back-ldbm.  back-ldbm
> > uses LDIF in id2entry, back-bdb uses BER.  Optimizing
> > BER and memory management will shift the balance further.
> yup. with ldif format it's definitely faster, I did some
> profiling on that.
> I'm currently thinking about a format which is (almost) the same on disk
> and in memory. Maybe I'll choose BER as well.