[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ITS#6439
> =46rom Solaris 10's 'ldapclient' manpage:
>
> defaultSearchScope=3Done | sub
>
> Specify the default search scope for the client's search
> operations. This default can be overridden for a given
> service by specifying a serviceSearchDescriptor. The
> default is one level search.
>
> The parameter 'defaultSearchScope' only allows ONE or SUB.
>
> The 'serviceSearchDescriptor' is not an option, since this is designed =
> to work with NSS objects like 'passwd', 'shadow', 'hosts', etc. rootDSE =
> is not a service in that sense, so it won't work here.
>
> For compatibility reasons, It may well be in OpenLDAP's best interest to =
> provide options such as the ones I described previously, for "broken" or =
> "substandard" clients such as the ones I am using.
>
> I will point out that Solaris 11 doesn't exhibit these issues ---- But =
> my company wants to use Solaris 10, which leaves me in the middle of a =
> finger pointing party between OPENLDAP and SUN. So you can understand =
> why I might be asking for something as strange as this ....
>
> SUN says OpenLDAP's standard/methods are questionable & strange. =
> OpenLDAP says Sun's client is broken and that we should hack it. I say =
> screw Solaris 10.
OpenLDAP may be questionable & strange, I'm not going to debate it. But I
pointed you to a RFC that clearly states what's the correct procedure to
perform an operation. You're pointing me to the man page of a client that
eventually got fixed across releases. If a client can't perform an
operation dictated by an RFC, and pretends to do it another way, I'd call
that "questionable & strange".
> Thank you for your assistance. You can probably close this ticket.
:)
p.