[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#5758) NO-OP control criticality
ando@sys-net.it writes:
> The latest draft I can find (14 February 2007) states that
>
> Clients MUST provide a
> criticality value of TRUE to prevent unintended modification of the
> directory.
>
> As a consequence, I think the server could reject instances of this control
> with a criticality of FALSE, to prevent its unintended use.
RFC 2251 allowed that (or could be read as alllowing it), but
RFC 4511 deliberately does not, after long discussions on ldapbis.
--
Hallvard