Re: (ITS#5568) Multiple Suffix not working in 2.3.39 Release.

[h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no]

quanah@zimbra.com writes:
> Multiple suffixes are indeed supported, but your configuration is
> completely invalid.

Why so?  Looks to me like a doc bug at best - the doc should say
that _some_ backends support multiple suffixes, and for others one
can use multiple databases instead.

Though the latter may indeed be what the poster needed.

BDB does support multiple suffixes #if defined(BDB_MULTIPLE_SUFFIXES),
but it's undocumented except for a FAQ entry which doesn't look right:
   http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/342.html
I don't see how subordinates can be a substitute for multiple suffixes
in a single database, since such suffixes should presumably not be
subordinates of each other.

-- 
Hallvard