[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#5309) ldap_pvt_thread_pool_setkey_x() addition



Pierangelo Masarati writes:
> Would it make any sense, at this point, to simply change the API of
> setkey(), eliminating that spurious setkey_x()?

I think setkey() is more readable than setkey_x().  If anything,
it already has too many arguments to be very readable.

-- 
Regards,
Hallvard