Re: ITS#5240

[hyc@symas.com]

quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
> --On November 22, 2007 5:11:30 PM +0000 ando@sys-net.it wrote:
> 
>> A fix for ITS#5183 has been partially imported into re24 (back-bdb.h;
>> init.c not yet).  I don't know if it was intended, or if the merging is
>> just in progress.
> 
> init.c was sync'd prior to this ITS even being filed, unless its a
> timestamp issue somewhere (11/21/2007).  back-bdb.h was sync'd except for
> the ifdef LDAP_DEVEL, which shouldn't have had an effect since
> BDB_MONITOR_IDX was already defined.  If things still aren't working with
> 2.4, then something else is the matter.

I don't know what timestamp you're looking at, but according to CVS init.c 
still has not been sync'd. (11/18/2007)
http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/back-bdb/init.c?hideattic=1&sortbydate=0

You should not be making blind commits into the Release Engineering branches. 
It's your job to verify that the commits are correct. back-bdb is broken in 
RE24 right now.
-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/