[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)



<quote who="Howard Chu">
> ghenry@suretecsystems.com wrote:
>
>> Depends on the time you have I suppose.
>>
>> I presume this isn't the case in 2.4?
>>
>> If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4?
>
> Referring people to 2.4 really isn't nice unless we have an actual release
> to
> refer them to. Which is another reason we need to get a 2.4 beta out ASAP.

True. Also, when I raised this ticket I wasn't part of the team, so I can
take on the man page fix if Hallvard doesn't have time.

> Since it looks like no activity has occurred on closing out the remaining
> devel
> ITSs perhaps we should just freeze the current tree and roll out 2.4.5
> as-is.

I think that would peak users interest again too.

> --
>    -- Howard Chu
>    Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
>    Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
>    Chief Architect, OpenLDAP     http://www.openldap.org/project/
>