[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#4907) Syncrepl consumer failing to perform deletes



------=_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

On 4/2/07, Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:
>
> > I am attempting to set up syncrepl between two OpenLDAP 2.3.32servers.  Adds
> > and Modifies are replicated from the provider to the consumer, but
> deletes
> > result in thousands of "unknown filter type 136644788" messages in the
> consumer
> > log and no deletion.  Commenting out the syncprov-sessionlog directive
> works
> > around the issue.
>
> I don't see this with 2.3.32 on Linux 2.6.18. You'll probably need to
> trace the activity with gdb to see what's wrong with the filter.


Right you are.  The patch for ITS#4638 (rejected here:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html) introduced
the bug.  I'll send in a corrected patch once it has been QA'd.

-- 
Thanks,
Sean Burford

------=_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/2/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Howard Chu</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:hyc@symas.com";>hyc@symas.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&gt; I am attempting to set up syncrepl between two OpenLDAP 2.3.32 servers.&nbsp;&nbsp;Adds<br>&gt; and Modifies are replicated from the provider to the consumer, but deletes<br>&gt; result in thousands of &quot;unknown filter type 136644788&quot; messages in the consumer
<br>&gt; log and no deletion.&nbsp;&nbsp;Commenting out the syncprov-sessionlog directive works<br>&gt; around the issue.<br><br>I don&#39;t see this with 2.3.32 on Linux 2.6.18. You&#39;ll probably need to<br>trace the activity with gdb to see what&#39;s wrong with the filter.
</blockquote><div><br>
Right you are.&nbsp; The patch for ITS#4638 (rejected here: <a href="http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html";>http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/200608/msg00043.html</a>) introduced the bug.&nbsp; I&#39;ll send in a corrected patch once it has been QA&#39;d.
<br><br></div></div>-- <br>Thanks,<br>Sean Burford

------=_Part_14849_31495008.1175634207921--