Re: (ITS#3845) support for SASL binds with plaintext rootpw

[jtownsend@opendarwin.org]

Maybe it wasn't clear... but I'm referring to a DN which is the  
updatedn and rootdn of the replica, not the rootdn of the master. In  
general you don't want the rootdn of the master to have the ability  
to modify a replica so that changes always come from slurpd, right?

-Jason

On Jul 7, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
> Well, the patch is fine (I'd add a descriptive comment to it) but  
> in general, slurpd should not be binding with the rootdn.
>
> We can probably add this to HEAD/RE23; I'm not sure it's eligible  
> for RE22.