Re: Réf. : Re: ACLs Enhancements (ITS#3515)

[ando@sys-net.it]

> This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> --=_alternative 005F2274C1256F94_=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> OK
> 1) I send you a PDF version jean-etienne-schwartz-050125-dynacl.pdf
> 2) Yes, I resubmit it with the good name
> 3) For me dynamic means that ACL come with the current node, automatically
> (see pdf)

Yes, I think I got the overall idea.

>         a) the keyword we use is 'dynacl'

Same as in HEAD: "by dynacl/<custom name>[=<pattern>] <access>" triggers
using the run-time loadable checks.

>         b) and d) no interactions with ACI or SET

I don't mean there needs to be a direct interaction; likely patch
inbtegration will be harder.  In any case, I assume a contribution with
such a large impact should well harmonize with existing features...

I'll keep reading.

p.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it


    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497