[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?

To: ando@sys-net.it
Subject: Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
From: Chris Markle <cmarkle@sendmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:00:56 -0800
Cc: openldap-bugs@OpenLDAP.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=tls; d=sendmail.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=ZI8Y2cxqON1WiO15Hu752QRlRWGlu0BbvgGcdAs9IhTu98RxGIZoBmTAgIu4hUbWH rMEahQfFp7kJk57FqvXIhpwQWcxP1XRahnVoaLGANyr/S3bx2WxJJi17x0MM2nNVzFN 5a+i1No05DN+10BVhYyeXVSmevDuUOAhD1gm3UM=
In-reply-to: <61285.81.72.89.40.1100895823.squirrel@81.72.89.40>
References: <419E2BA5.5060305@sendmail.com> <61285.81.72.89.40.1100895823.squirrel@81.72.89.40>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910

Pierangelo,

does the problem affect 2.2/HEAD as well?  There won't likely be any
further release of 2.1, but patches that fix problems in past releases can
be surely hosted and advertized; feel free to submit it thru the ITS.

Yes it does (should?). I will pretend I'm running 2.2 and open an ITS. Just don't beta me up to much to try this and that as we're not running the 2.2 level ;)

Chris

References:
- Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
  - From: Chris Markle <cmarkle@sendmail.com>
- Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: Do you guys want 2.1.x patches anymore?
Next by Date: (ITS#3400) loop in slapd_daemon_task() (daemon.c) after repeated EBADF returns from select()
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread