>> >>Sorry for the late reply; please see recent comment to ITS#2568. >>p. > > In the case of ITS#2641, this should not change anything, as > BACKSQL_REALLOC_STMT is defined at the beginning of modify.c OK, I didn't notice I committed that. Do you confirm the persistence of the problem? p. -- Pierangelo Masarati mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it